Debate there should be no exams

debate there should be no exams No, exams sudn't b abolished if der r no exams most ppl won't study or wud b 2 lazy 2 study and those who wud study won't b able 2 analyise themselves share to.

Many students dislike exams and children of all ages seem to have a diet of more and more exams that they have to take coursework is being discredited as a way of demonstrating knowledge as it is becoming easier to plagiarise or even buy coursework over the internet. Best answer: no,they shouldn't be abolished bcoz its board exams that tell us where we standif they were not there the students from small villages or towns can do much more great than us by opening the book and answer it. Sure the sat requires most of us to develop a work ethic to actually study for the exam, but studying for the sat completely translatable into the method you would take to write a college essay. In 2011, macquarie university was the first australian university to debate the abolition of exams no exams in any subject, at any year level no exams in any subject, at any year level.

Another reason examination should not be abolished is that it helps students to know their weaknesses and strengths of the subject and tell students what they need to improve on read more: essay on if there were no exams. Unless exams are also to be computer based there is still a need for handwriting lessons - it's the only practice kids get with pen and paper these days +0 cursive writing , low-rated comment [ show . Over the years, board exams have become a part and parcel of every student's life the success or failure in these exams holds the key to a students academic future.

Review opinions on the online debate no exams hi mate i think you should focus more on not wasting your turnsu just wasted one trn asking about resolution. There are advantages in exams, but there are people who think the opposite that exams have more disadvantages to the students and should be abolished some people say that exams should not be abolished, because they say that exams are the only way for teachers to see the student's level. Ann coulter and nomiki konst appeared on fox and friends to debate if citizens should have to pass a civics test in order to vote coulter argued that there should be a test and it should be. Exams are another way of testing intellectual knowledge thus, students should have the option in case they want to sit for a subject without assisting regular lessons in the institution.

First of all, the main reason examination should not be replaced with other forms of assessment is because of the equality of opportunity it has the best application of it is the content of knowledge and it is fair enough to all the students who have to sit for the same exam using the same method in one particular country. However, it is a sizeable part of the school that all students have to go through there are advantages in exams, yet there are stack who think the opposite that exams have more disadvantages to the students and should be abolished. Get an answer for 'examination in school should not be abolished -- thoughtsgive ur views for or against the topic' and find homework help for other teachers questions at enotes. There are more than 50+ entrance exams in india for students to choose between and most of the exam are on paper according to research students tend to make mistake while writing on a paper than on the computer screen.

Debate there should be no exams

debate there should be no exams No, exams sudn't b abolished if der r no exams most ppl won't study or wud b 2 lazy 2 study and those who wud study won't b able 2 analyise themselves share to.

I totally agree that examinations should not be banned in schools firstly, exams help you to improve your standard secondly, it can solve your mistakes that you made, so that you wont make the same mistakes over again so i say, exams are good to all of us everyone needs improvement. The students talking for the motion said that no exam will reduce the drama and stress of exam, evil of tuitions, importance given to cramming. Of the rest, 16 wanted no midterm or final exams, and 11 said they should be administered in a different format loudoun school board member bill fox (leesburg) pointed out that some teachers may.

  • Yes examination should be there because exams judge us if examination will not there students will not worry about studies and teacher will not know how much they have understood students will not give attention towards the teacher's teaching.
  • That is the theory part the reality is the opposite history is full of people who try every trick in the book to cheat at exam time there is not enough space in this column for all the.

Coursework is valuable but should be used in conjunction with exams a student might answer a question very well given time and help from teachers, family and textbooks, but then be unable to apply what they have learnt to another question coming from a different angle. If we didn't have exams that accounted for large percentages of our grades, students would no longer have the opportunity to drastically change how they do at the end of the semester. There are advantages in exams, but there are people who think the opposite that exams have more disadvantages to the students and should be abolished some people say that exams should not be abolished, because they say that exams are the only way for teachers to see the student's level, it builds high sense of responsibilities, and it gives.

debate there should be no exams No, exams sudn't b abolished if der r no exams most ppl won't study or wud b 2 lazy 2 study and those who wud study won't b able 2 analyise themselves share to. debate there should be no exams No, exams sudn't b abolished if der r no exams most ppl won't study or wud b 2 lazy 2 study and those who wud study won't b able 2 analyise themselves share to.
Debate there should be no exams
Rated 3/5 based on 16 review